Brand in the news: Susan Boyle

 

Susan Boyle is a person, not a brand. Nonetheless, she did something that many brands should learn from: she under-promised and over-delivered.

Boyle has magnificently demonstrated that substance is more important than style, or, indeed, that sometimes it is more substantial to be unstyled. It is ironic that a host of companies are now clamouring for her endorsement.

It's easy to see where it's heading: makeover campaigns such as 'our haircare product transformed Susan Boyle', which will ultimately destroy the true beauty she represents.

What these publicity-hungry brands should be doing is asking how they, like her, can make their product exceed expectation. Alas, many marketing people's idea of marketing is the inverse of this.

Susan Boyle would be justified in taking brands' money and running.

However, if she does, sponsors should beware. Her element of surprise is gone. We now expect her to sing well, and with each new song the delight of surprise will diminish, and so will the ROI of the sponsorship.

Unless, of course, Boyle has more surprises yet to come.

X

You must log in to use Clip & Save

 
 

All Comments

James Amoroso

James Amoroso - 01 June 2009

As a brand, she faces the same challenges as Snapple, Innocent and Ben & Jerry's. How do you develop that fresh, quirky personality in a way that enhances the original proposition?

Yes, she'll need more surprises... and she'll need to deal with public scrutiny calmly and professionally.

 

Comments

 
 
 

To post comments please log in here

 
 

Jobs

 

News By Email

You can sign up for our bulletins. Select bulletins you are interested in, enter your email adress an click the button below

Preview
Preview
Preview