Guardian editor takes 10% pay cut and GMG boss waives bonus

 

LONDON - Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of Guardian News & Media, has elected to take a 10% pay cut, while Guardian Media Group (GMG) chief executive Carolyn McCall is waiving her personal performance bonus for 2008-9.

The news of their sacrifices, which was reported by Media Guardian today, coincides with the National Union of Journalist's (NUJ) campaign against GMG's implementation of staff cuts across its regional newspapers.

The NUJ took out a full-page ad in The Guardian this week, accusing GMG of "devastating staff cuts" at its Manchester Evening News and Surrey & Berkshire Media local newspaper groups.

The ad claimed that the cuts were being made to support The Guardian, "which is losing many millions but still paying executive bonuses".

According to the Media Guardian report, Rusbridger and McCall both informed the NUJ of their decisions last month.

Rusbridger is understood to be taking a 10% pay cut this year. It is not known what his 2008-9 salary is but he was paid a basic salary of £385,000 in 2007-8. He does not take part in GMG's bonus scheme.

The bonus McCall has passed up relates to the achievement of her personal objectives in GMG's 2008-9 financial year. This finished at the end of March although the results have not been published.

It is possible that personal achievement bonuses may still be taken by other GMG executives, such as Guardian News & Media chief Tim Brooks.

GMG decided in February it would not pay McCall and other executives separate financial performance bonuses for 2008-9 and applied a pay freeze across the whole company.

A statement from a GMG spokesman said that Rusbridger and McCall had felt it was appropriate to inform the NUJ chapels of their decision and described information about other managers' bonuses as "an individual, private matter".

X

You must log in to use Clip & Save

 
 

All Comments

FP

FP - 03 April 2009

Private Eye reports that Rusbridger was the happy recipient of a 15% pay rise for the year 2008-09 taking his salary to £544,000, which must include some perks and benefits to explain the difference from £385,000 in 2007-08. So a cut of only 10% from this elevated figure sends exactly the right kind of message for a pro-labour paper banging on about the rewards for failiure.

 

Comments

 
 
 

To post comments please log in here

 
 

Jobs

 

News By Email

You can sign up for our bulletins. Select bulletins you are interested in, enter your email adress an click the button below

Preview
Preview
Preview