Sex ad was not only risque, it risked the industry's reputation

Do you media agency people ever have trouble explaining to "normal" people what you do for a living?

Tess Alps, chief executive of Thinkbox
Tess Alps, chief executive of Thinkbox

My mate, Jonathan Durden, used to get so frustrated trying to explain what a planner does that he resorted to telling his aunties that he made Coronation Street, something they could relate to more easily. Occasionally, something happens that provides a brilliant illustration of what planning is, but, sadly, it's usually when something goes wrong.

Last week's Advertising Standards Authority ban of the Advanced Medical Institute's campaign that posed the question "Want Longer Lasting Sex?" in big neon letters on 48 sheets, is a classic example of media planning gone bad.

In the right medium, at the right time, to the right people there would be nothing offensive about that message at all.

I did smile when I heard the institute is based in Australia. I suggest you have a go at saying the line with a Melbourne accent, with or without the addition of "cobber" at the end, and you'll find it sounds authentically antipodean.

What constitutes offence is a tricky subject. We have recently seen far too much manufactured outrage at media events that were not offensive at all to the people who actually saw/heard/read the offending content and to whom it was targeted.

Not that volumes of complaints should be the only criterion when it comes to judging offence, but when we have people complaining about things they have not even experienced themselves, we are on a slippery slope to censorship and bland uniformity.

The Advanced Medical Institute case though, was surely cut and dried. I remember driving past the poster in West End Lane as groups of kids shuffled past it going to school and wondering how on earth it had been allowed to get through the system.

Maybe there isn't a system. Or maybe the normal system had been suspended because of the crisis in ad revenues.

What was institute's media agency thinking? It's quite possible that it was planned cynically, knowing it would create some outrage and, with it, some free publicity.

What was Titan thinking? Maybe it was just taking the money or possibly thinking it would prove something about its medium's ability to "cut through".

If either did think along those lines, they were putting important principles at risk for the sake of short-term gain: the self-regulatory system that we operate under, the stature of outdoor and, ultimately, the reputation of the advertising industry itself. They should have asked themselves: "Want longer-lasting advertising?"

Tess Alps is chief executive of Thinkbox
tess.alps@haymarket.com

Have your say...

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Media Week Jobs
Search for more media jobs

Latest

IPG's UK revenue jumps 21% after Profero acquisition

IPG's UK revenue jumps 21% after Profero acquisition

Interpublic Group (IPG) the owner of Initiative, Lowe and Partners and McCann, saw its UK revenue rise 21 per cent in the first three months of this year, boosted by its acquisition of Profero.

Share
JCDecaux partners with Hachette UK for Twitter book club

JCDecaux partners with Hachette UK for Twitter book club

JCDecaux has struck the first content partnership for its commuter book club, with publisher Hachette UK.

Share
Samsung calls global advertising and media review

Samsung calls global advertising and media review

Samsung has put its global advertising and media accounts up for review.

Share

Get news by email