Savile-related investigations cost the BBC almost £5m

The remuneration for executive directors rose by more than 60 per cent at the BBC last year, fuelled by the high costs of legal fees and pay-offs.

Lord Patten: chairman of the BBC Trust
Lord Patten: chairman of the BBC Trust

The internal annual 2012/13 report released by the BBC today showed how much the Jimmy Savile case, the 'Newsnight' crisis over the failure to broadcast the related abuse allegations, and the departure of the former director-general George Entwistle in November 2012 cost the BBC.

The report revealed that the organisation spent almost £3 million in legal costs in the year to 31 March 2013. This included legal fees of £101,000 for Helen Boaden, who stepped aside as the director of news at the BBC following the 'Newsnight' incident, and £86,000 for former director general Mark Thompson.

Entwistle cost the BBC £107,000 in the form of legal fees and £470,000 in a pay-off following his departure.

The total cost of the Savile scandal has been calculated at £5 million by the report, a figure that will be added to once the report into the investigation of the former BBC radio and TV presenter Stuart Hall is published later this year.

Lord Patten, the BBC Trust chairman, reflecting on the report said that the BBC needed to learn from a year of "incredible highs" and "desperate lows".

He added that the BBC had "seriously let down both itself and licence-fee payers".

Tony Hall, the new director general for the BBC said the BBC "has not always been the steward of public money that it should have been".

He stressed that in this light, the BBC needed to refresh its top team, reemphasise its values, and embed greater personal accountability.

The report also showed a drop in surplus from £389 million to £328 million, but showed a slight increase in the BBC's revenue, which was up by 3 per cent this year to £5,102 million, mostly from licence fees.

Have your say...

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Media Week Jobs
Search for more media jobs

Latest

Timeline: A look back at April Fool's marketing

Timeline: A look back at April Fool's marketing

It is every pranksters' dream day, but now the annual practical joke occasion is an opportunity for brands to put themselves in the eye of gullible/on the ball consumers via creative pranks. Here, we take a look back at the best hoaxes throughout the last decade.

Share
Brands on Buzzfeed: Just add puppy GIFs

Brands on Buzzfeed: Just add puppy GIFs

We take a look at McVitie's posts on Buzzfeed (a long look, puppies are involved), James Cordon's bod and an even longer look at April Fool's Day pranks over the past decade.

Share
Martin Sorrell: Advocacy is part of advertising

Martin Sorrell: Advocacy is part of advertising

Advocacy is not threatening to usurp advertising because they are both part of the same process, according to WPP's chief executive, Sir Martin Sorrell.

Share

Get news by email