ITV's push to scrap CRR is about money, Lords told

The price of advertising on ITV1 would rise by up to 10% if the Government removes ITV's airtime selling restrictions, a Lords committee was told yesterday.

ITV: ad sales under scrutiny
ITV: ad sales under scrutiny

Steve Williams, chairman of the IPA Media Futures group, was speaking to the House of Lords communications committee, which is reviewing the regulation of TV advertising.

He said: "If you were to put a number on what could happen [if CRR was removed] it could be price rises in the region of five to 10%."

"We have no doubt that the cost [of airtime] would go up. If an interested party is looking to remove a control there's no doubt that's because they will make money.

"[CRR's removal] will have the effect of prices uncontrollably going up and there is no doubt that, with ITV's power, that ITV would stand to gain above other stations."

The House of Lords Communications Committee announced its review in July – two and a half months after the Competition Commission ruled that CRR, which was introduced after the merger of Carlton and Granada in 2003, should stay.

While the review is looking at all aspects of TV advertising regulation, CRR has become a major theme of the sessions after ITV chairman Archie Norman told the Committee that CRR forced ITV into a "ratings rat race".

Under the terms of CRR, advertisers and media buyers can reduce their spend on ITV1 if the audience delivered by ITV1 falls, offering protection to advertisers and agencies and an incentive to ITV to commission programming that attracts high audiences.

Advertisers and agencies, with a pre-merger relationship with ITV, can reduce their ad spend on ITV1 and still get the same discount, giving them an advantage over new entrants to the market.

Williams was giving evidence at yesterday's session alongside Tom George, chief executive of MEC, Andy Jones, chief executive of UM, and Geoffrey Russell, director for media affairs at the IPA.

George said: "Fundamentally things haven't changed. That is, ITV1 is still a very important channel. ITV1 is still a very important channel from within TV as it is has a unique property in that it is able to build coverage very rapidly."

The panel dismissed suggestions that CRR had contributed to consolidation within the buying points but attributed the decline in number of buying groups to consolidation in TV sales houses.

Jones, when asked why there was a need for media agencies, said it was not possible to "un-invent" them. He said: "We are there to negotiate on behalf of clients. We are paid to do a job – our job is to get the best value."

In this, as in previous sessions, the Lords asked whether the current trading model could be replaced by an online auction which the panel said was unsuitable for all but the most popular programmes, like 'The X Factor'.

Have your say...

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Media Week Jobs
Search for more media jobs

Latest

AOL's Graham Moysey on why we need to invest in people to evolve

AOL's Graham Moysey on why we need to invest in people to evolve

At college I once read a quote from Aristotle that has stayed with me to this day - "The one exclusive sign of thorough knowledge is the power of teaching".

Share
Thriving digital listening opens up new opportunities

Thriving digital listening opens up new opportunities

As this week's Rajar figures highlight digital listening hours are at an all-time high, up 6.4% (yoy), Simon Kilby, head of marketplace at Bauer Media, points to new commercial opportunities.

Share
Trinity Mirror considers appeal of £1.2m phone-hacking charges

Trinity Mirror considers appeal of £1.2m phone-hacking charges

Trinity Mirror is considering an appeal after a High Court judge ordered the publisher to pay "very substantial" damages to celebrities Sadie Frost, Paul Gascoigne and others for phone-hacking.

Share

Get news by email